Argument Analysis Essay

    Please write an analysis of ONE of the following:

    Go Ahead, Speak for Yourself by Kwame Anthony Appiah (pgs. 114-115)
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/10/opinion/sunday/speak-for-yourself.html

    How Do You Explain the ‘Obvious’ by Nausicaa Renner (pgs. 117-119)
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/21/magazine/how-do-you-explain-the-obvious.html

    The Checklist for Analyzing a Text will be extremely helpful to you as you develop your analysis. You are welcome to do outside research, whether for context or other responses to the text; however, this is neither required nor necessary to complete this task effectively.

    Essentially, you are writing a rhetorical analysis, which should include:

    A solid summary of the text: what it is saying, what it is arguing, and why that is important
    Identification of the authors thesis, intended audience, message, purpose, and rhetorical methods used
    A clear thesis: Your judgment regarding the effectiveness of the text or argument that it makes
    Reasonable support for your conclusions: analysis of the text should be supported by evidence from the text itself.

    Requirements and Assessment Criteria:

    MLA format (including works cited and in-text citations for your chosen article, along with any optional outside research utilized).
    1200-1500 words (not including works cited).
    Clarity of thought: Your ideas should flow logically from one to the next
    Spelling and grammar: Your essay should be proofread and free of sentence level errors
    In addition to the basic requirements listed above, when I read your argument analyses, I will be looking for evidence of the criteria listed in the Checklist for Writing an Analysis of an Argument

    A Checklist for analyzing a text:
    Have I considered all the following matters?
    – Does the author have a self-interest in writing this piece?
    – Is there evidence in the author’s tone and style that enables me to identify anything about the intended audience? Is the tone appropriate?
    – Given the publication venue (or any other contexts), can I tell if the audience is likely to be neutral, sympathetic, or hostile to the argument?
    – Does the author have a thesis? Does the argument ask the audience to accept or to do anything?
    – Does the author make assumptions? Does the audience share those assumptions? Do I?
    – Is there a clear line between what is factual information and what is interpretation, belief, or opinion?
    – Does the author appeal to reason (logos), to the emotions (pathos), or to our sense that the speaker is trustworthy (ethos)?
    – Is there evidence provided convincing? If visual materials such as graphs, pie charts, or pictures are used, are they persuasive?
    – Are significant objections and counterevidence adequately discussed?
    – Is the organization of the text effective? Are the title, the opening paragraphs, and the concluding paragraphs effective?
    – Is the overall argument correct in its conclusions? Or is there anything missing that I could use to add to or challenge the argument?
    – Has the author convinced me?

                                                                                                                                      Order Now